jeddthedoge initiates a thoughtful discussion on the complexities of starting a .NET project, with community members providing nuanced perspectives on why .NET emphasizes structure through DTOs, layers, and frameworks like Entity Framework.

Reflections on .NET Project Structure and Complexity for Beginners

Author: jeddthedoge (community discussion)

Initial Question

A junior developer, jeddthedoge, shares their feelings while creating a first .NET project, noting:

  • The apparent complexity of .NET (DTOs, multiple layers, EF migrations, the use of OnModelCreating).
  • A comparison to the simplicity of spinning up a Node.js Express backend.
  • A realization: much of .NET’s structure is aimed at making legacy, long-lived applications maintainable over years.

Key Question Raised:

How much more difficult is it for projects written in .NET to become messy compared to other languages?

Community Responses

  • You aren’t forced to use every architectural pattern. Minimal APIs and direct database connections are also possible in .NET—more complexity is a trade-off for maintainability in complex or long-term projects.
  • The initial poster clarifies they aren’t “hating” on .NET or Entity Framework, but are grappling with the structured, layered approach being new to them.

Comparative Insights

  • A community member offers a gist with example apps in both .NET and Express.js, showing:
    • .NET provides out-of-the-box validations, logging, configuration, testing, and structured immutability, whereas with Node.js/Express, these require manual setup and additional packages.
    • Node.js, even with third-party packages like Zod for validation, can become “bloated” and slower, and may lack type safety by default compared to .NET.
  • Another responder points out that many concepts (DTOs, architecture, ORMs) aren’t specific to .NET and exist in the Node.js world with more complex frameworks like NestJS.
  • Companies often prefer frameworks with convention and structure to ease onboarding and maintain standards.
  • “Batteries included” frameworks can save teams from re-inventing architectural solutions as a project grows.

Summary of Key Points

  • .NET’s structure (DTOs, multiple layers, established patterns) may seem “overengineering” for small, new projects but provide immense value as systems and teams scale.
  • Express.js offers a faster and simpler entry point but eventually requires architectural work as a project matures.
  • The trade-off is between initial simplicity and long-term maintainability, with .NET opting for conventions that anticipate complexity.

Takeaways for Developers

  • Evaluate project requirements: For proofs of concept or small apps, minimal API approaches in .NET or simple Express backends may suffice.
  • For applications expected to grow, .NET’s structural expectations may save substantial technical debt down the line.
  • Understand that complexity in frameworks is often motivated by experience with large, long-running codebases—not just arbitrary design decisions.

This post appeared first on “Reddit DotNet”. Read the entire article here